J642 Quantitative Methods

Winter 2012

Tuesday, Thursday, 4-5:50, 100 Agate Hall


JOHN RUSSIAL

309A Allen Hall 346-3750

Office hours: Tues, 2-3; Thurs, 2-3; Wed, noon-1 p.m., or by appointment, or stop by the office.

E-Mail: jrussial@uoregon.edu

Web page: http://jcomm.uoregon.edu/~jrussial/quant/

Beginning of the schedule
Jump to the middle of the schedule


Readings

Wimmer & Dominick, Mass Media Research, 8th ed., Wadsworth, 2006
I've asked the bookstore to get the 8th edition, even though the 9th is out. Note: a 7th edition (Hardcover, 2003) will work just fine if you have access to one--the chapters are basically the same. Or the ninth edition.

Other materials: Additional readings will be on reserve in Student Services and on the web. I will place copies of research articles and other methods chapters on reserve from time to time in Student Services (In the adviser trailer behind Agate). I also will put copies of chapters from the book From Numbers to Words by Morgan, Reichert and Harrison on reserve. This book has examples of how to report research results for a variety of statistical techniques.

Course overview

This class is designed to explore quantitative approaches to research methodology and to have students plan research using these approaches. Much of the class will focus on issues in quantitative analysis, such as measurement, sampling, reliability, validity, research ethics, appropriate statistics and data analysis. We'll look at such questions as, What are the strengths and weaknesses of quantitative approaches? When are these methods appropriate and when aren't they? What issues must you address in designing a quantitative study?

I would like this class to be both practical and analytical. It will involve analyzing and critiquing quantitative studies as well as developing skills in conducting such research.

A key goal of the class is to produce a research plan and a paper completed up to the point of data collection/results. In recent years, a number of students completed these projects in an advanced quantitative methods class in spring, and several led to conference presentations

Class sessions

Class meets twice a week. I lean much more toward discussion than lecturing, and class participation is crucial. I like to raise questions as much as, if not more than, provide answers. I'll expect you to have completed the readings by the time of the class and to be able to show your mastery of them in class discussion. Throughout the term, we will discuss and critique your research plans. Five or six class meetings will be SPSS workshop sessions. We will use the PC version of SPSS in Agate 100 (that's why we;re scheduled there).

Grading

Required work will include short papers or article critiques due throughout the term, a longer research paper (mentioned above) and data exercises. There will be a presentation of the longer paper in the last week of class.

Short (2-3 page) papers: Critiques of articles and/or answers to take-home questions. The short papers will be due about every two weeks. Each short paper will have a due date. Late papers will be accepted only in case of unavoidable circumstances, and I might require documentation of such circumstances. I've spent too much time in the media to wink at deadlines. Also, because I've spent most of my career as a copy editor, I tend to think less of papers that are full of errors in spelling, grammar or punctuation. Make sure to proofread.

In-class critiques: Students will lead a brief class discussion on an assigned research article. We will probably do this in teams.

Data exercises: A graded exercise based on work using SPSS in the lab.

Final paper: My hope is that you will plan a final research project that you can eventually use as part of a conference paper. This paper will be a research report without the Results and Conclusion sections. In other words, it will have an Introduction, a Literature Review, a Methods section and dummy tables. To produce such a paper, you will need to be working on the idea throughout the term.

Students often develop a research area by pursuing related projects in different classes. I think that's a good approach, but it does not mean you can do the same, or a very similar, paper for more than one class. Your paper for this class should be an original effort for this class. If you have any questions about this requirement, let's talk about it.

It should go without saying, but attendance is expected, and a good participation/evaluation grade depends on it.  

Your overall grade will be based on the following formula:

Short papers, data exercises40 %
Research paper40 %
Presentation/discussion10 %
Class participation/evaluation 10 %

My background

I consider myself both a scholar and a professional. As a professional, I spent most of my career working as a daily newspaper copy editor and copy chief. As a researcher, I examine some of the issues I observed in practice as a professional. I study newsroom technology and organizational change, primarily from sociological and management perspectives, with an underlying aim of examining and critiquing media performance and quality. Most of my published work has used quantitative analyses, including content analysis and survey methods.

Academic dishonesty

Portions of the work for this class may be done in teams or groups; most will be done as individuals. I will make it clear on each assignment what is to be done in groups and what should be done as individuals. I expect you to follow accepted scholarly practice on citation of the work of others. There are different styles (e.g., Chicago, APA, MLA). There is no hard and fast style rule for quantitative work--it tends to depend on the field, sometimes on a given journal within a field, or even to which division you might submit a paper for academic conferences. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, for example, wants Chicago Style. Many journals ask for APA style (In-text citations and a reference list). Occasionally, it's even a mix of styles. Newspaper Research Journal, for example, wants AP style in text and Chicago style used for endnotes. I'd suggest using a style that's common in work that is similar to yours.

Tentative schedule

Besides readings from the books, I will assign other materials — most of them journal articles. I may add or drop a couple of journal articles. I will put them on reserve in the reading room and most are are available online through the library databases.

Week 1: Jan. 10, 12 — Introduction

Types of Research, Research Procedures, Quantitative and Qualitative, Strengths and Weaknesses

Wimmer & Dominick, Chapters 1, 3 also p. 48-50 in 8th ed., (p. 47-48 in 7th).
Also, Chapter 5 is a short summary of Qualitative approaches. If you're taking Qualitative Methods, forget about this chapter.


Week 2: Jan. 17, 19 — Measurement, Operationalizing, Sampling, Reliability, Validity

Wimmer & Dominick, Chapters 2, 4

Skim Chapters 13-16 for summaries of research in communications fields using quantitative methods.

Assignment, due Jan. 19 ** -- One-page topic idea for the final project. This should include a general statement of the research problem and a discussion of how it can be studied quantitatively. To do this, you'll need to begin discussing how you can operationalize the concepts you intend to study. This short paper may also include a brief discussion of the conceptual or theoretical framework for the problem.

Zoch and Turk, "Women Making News: Gender as a Variable in Source Selection and Use" Journalism and Mass Comm Quarterly, Winter '98, 762-775.

Becker, Beam & Russial, "Correlates of Daily Newspaper Performance in New England," Journalism Quarterly, 55 (1), 100-108.

The methodology section of the Kaiser Foundation "Sex on TV 3" study— on the Web in PDF format. Note: This is now a link to the index for the Sex on TV 4 report. You can just get the Methodology section as a separate file (about 10 pages). Let's use this one. The one listed in the original syllabus does not have a separate pdf for Methodology (and the whole report is over 80 pages).

A good primer on some research terms.
Statistical terms--a primer for journalists From the Shorenstein Center


Week 3: Jan. 24, 26— Begin Content Analysis
Background readings on Research Ethics
SPSS session Tuesday, Jan. 24. Wimmer & Dominick, Chapter 6;


See also, the Web site of the University's Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects. See also, the university's Human Subjects application forms page and The Collaborative IRB Training Initiative (CITI), an online training program that all UO researchers (faculty and students) who deal with human subjects have to have completed before Human Subjects' approval for a project can be given.

Assignment, due Jan. 26 --First short paper



Week 4: Jan. 31, Feb. 2 — Content Analysis

SPSS session Tuesday, Jan. 31.

Riffe, Aust, Lacy, "The Effectiveness of Random, Consecutive Day and Constructed Week Sampling in Newspaper Content Analysis, Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 70, No. 1, Spring '93, 133-139.

(the article we will discuss in class and will use in lab--probably week 5 lab)
Robert Entman, "Blacks in the News..." Journalism Quarterly, Summer '92, 341-361

The following papers will be used for class discussion on Feb. 9:

Sheehan and Doherty, "Re-Weaving the Web: Integrating Print and Online Communications," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 15, No. 2, Spring 2001

Russial, "Topic Team Performance: A Content Study," Newspaper Research Journal, (1997) Winter/Spring, 126-144.

Barger, "Moral Language in Newspaper Commentary: A Kohlbergian Analysis," Journal of Mass Media Ethics (2003), 18(1), 29-43



Week 5: Feb. 7, 9; SPSS session, Content Analysis continued

SPSS session, Tuesday, Feb. 7

Wimmer & Dominick, Chapter 12, p. 279-284 on Chi Square

Three studies from previous week (Sheehan, Russial, Barger)
Here are an online Chi Square calculator and a Chi Square Tutorial from an online site. Here's a pretty good online statistics reference called Statsoft. The section"Basic Statistics" chapter has a good section on correlations, t-tests and cross tabs. Another section (see the index in the right frame) discusses ANOVA and related techniques.

Here is a link to a Random Number Generator. Here's one for a tool called Recal, which makes it easy to compute different reliability coefficients. Here is one reference that helps in selecting statistical tests. Here is another one. Thanks to Toby Hopp for the last few references.

Here are some other references:

  • Correlation and Simple Linear Regression A YouTube video--part of the SPSS Lecture Series. There are others as well in the series.
  • Another correlation reference
  • Hyperstat: See #9. Logic of hypothesis testing The rest of these are very good as well.
  • What Is a Null Hypothesis?"
    Morgan, Reichert and Harrison, From Numbers to Words Chapter 6 has examples of reporting Chi Square results

    Assignment, due Feb. 9--Introduction and beginning of Lit Review for final project. Four pages minimum. This should expand on the proposal. Introduce the issue and begin discussing relevant literature. Refer to at least three theory or research articles or chapters as sources.

    Week 6: Feb. 14, 16 — Survey Research, Internet Research

    Wimmer & Dominick, Chapter 7, Chapter 10-12, Chapter 17

    Information on survey methods From the Pew Center for People and the Press.
    The following papers will be used for class discussion on Feb. 23:

    Maxwell and Wanta, "Advertising Agencies Reduce Reliance on Newspaper Ads," Newspaper Research Journal, Spring 2001, (22, 2), 51-56

    Maier and Potter, "Public Journalism Through the Lens: How Television Broadcasters Covered Campaign '96," Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, Spring 2001, 45(2), p. 320-334. (This study uses survey and content analysis methods.)

    Randal A. Beam, "What it Means to Be a Market-Oriented Newspaper," Newspaper Research Journal, Summer 1998 (19,3), p. 2-20.

    Assignment, due Feb. 16--Second short paper


    Week 7: Feb. 21, 23 — Survey Research and Statistics Continued, SPSS session

    SPSS session, Tuesday, Feb. 21

    Morgan et. al, Chapter 6 has examples of reporting correlation analysis and Chapter 7 has examples of reporting t-test and ANOVA.


    Week 8: Feb. 28, March 1 ** — SPSS session, Longitudinal Research

    SPSS session, Tuesday, Feb. 28

    Wimmer & Dominick, Chapter 8

    Assignment, due ** -- Completed Introduction and Lit Review (plus methods draft) for final project. You can put this in my mailbox Thursday, March 1; Friday, March 2, or e-mail it if you're going to be in Portland for the TV conference. I should be able to get it back to you early the next week.

    Week 9: March 6, 8 — Multivariate methods (in lab), Experimental Methods, Critiquing research, Report-writing issues

    SPSS session, Tuesday, March 8

    Wimmer & Dominick, Chapter 9

    The AEJMC's Research Committe offers Tips for Reviewing Conference Papers. It also offers suggestions for poster sessions and high-density sessions. Note: These two pages seem to have disappeared from the AEJMC web site. I'm checking if they can be found elsewhere.
    Assignment, due March 8: Data analysis exercises

    Here is The assignment

    Morgan, Chapters 2, 8 and previously mentioned chapters may be of help.


    Week 10: March 13, 15 — Presentation and discussion of papers

    Assignment due Friday, March 16 -- Final project: Completed Introduction, Lit Review, Methods section and dummy charts for final project.


    Back to the top